Molossia borders on the map

Hello,

I noticed that when you add a banknote of Molossia in your collection it count for the whole united state in the map ...
Would it be possible to define a smaller border into the united States only for Molossia?
By default all banknotes of United state should color the area of Molossia as it's a micronation where US dollars con use to be trade but when we add a banknote of Molossia it should only collor this part.

This country shouldn't even exist. The notes are even listed as fantasy. The coins are under exonumia as fantasy but the fantasy bills are somehow a country. It can't be both....

Quote: "Tovarich"​This country shouldn't even exist. The notes are even listed as fantasy. The coins are under exonumia as fantasy but the fantasy bills are somehow a country. It can't be both....

​The problem stay the same in the Exonumia section, if you select own 1 coin of Molossia then it color the full United State.
In all cases I don’t get your point, if you don’t collect such item there is no impact for you or I missed something?
If you think Molossia and others micronations have nothing to do on the general catalog please make a new thread for it. I personally don’t mind where they are as long as we try to solve the problem described. And the problem stay the same for banknotes, coins and Exonumia.

The point is that Molossia coins are exonumia and Molossia banknotes are not exonumia. They are all the same fantasy money. They are either both exonumia or neither of them are. We strive for consistency in this catalog and this is the opposite of consistency. Someone made a thread for removing Molossia's banknotes as a country in the banknote catalog forum over six months ago which I recently bumped up and it has never been responded to.

None of the micronations have smaller borders on the map, so only changing Molossia without changing Hutt River, Lundy, Seborga, Sealand would create an inconsistency for something that is currently consistent.

Quote: "Tovarich"​None of the micronations have smaller borders on the map, so only changing Molossia without changing Hutt River, Lundy, Seborga, Sealand would create an inconsistency for something that is currently consistent.

​So when something is wrong we should not correct it for the sack of consistency? My point was to bring light on this particular case to see if others collector interested by Micronations think the same. I obviously didn’t though that anyone without interested for Micronation will complain about something that don’t affect them.

In all cases I agree with you, if some Micronation have their banknotes in the banknotes catalog and others no, they should be in or not, but not separated. The same goes for the coins.