I noticed that one,but when I expanded the image,it shows mint mark B-star/n. Maybe, the A-crescent/n is a variation of 152. Except for the mint mark it is the same.
I noticed that one,but when I expanded the image,it shows mint mark B-star/n. Maybe, the A-crescent/n is a variation of 152. Except for the mint mark it is the same. Thank you.
Quote: "EddieDiz" I noticed that one,but when I expanded the image,it shows mint mark B-star/n. Maybe, the A-crescent/n is a variation of 152. Except for the mint mark it is the same.
Attributions, typically, doesn't go into that level of detail. Imagine how many unique numbers you would need for each mint, sigla variations (moneyer marks) and type of coin! Unger, however, adds a small letter to the attribution number for various mint marks which is simpler. Here is the entry in Unger:
I forgot about a DVD I bought from ebay about 2 years ago. Included on it there is a catalog called Numi Hungariae,Iacobus Rupp dated 1846. It has that mint mark listed during the 1444-46 time period like you said and listed in Table XVI,number 461.