Pakistan inconsistency P9 [solved]

The article 1 rupee ND Pick#9
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note232588.html

describes Variety of fractional prefix without dividing line:
ND (1953-1961) 20% Signed by the Mumtaz Hassan

Notes.
1. Obviously the percentage is from wrongly described occurrence of lines and has nothing to do with frequency as it expected to be. This is not the case of this topic and in this post onwards this nonsense will be omitted.
2. Obviously though the name is a foreign it is still a name and should be treated by catalog in English correspondently, thus instead of 'Signed by the Mumtaz Hassan' please read 'Signed by Mumtaz Hassan'. This mistake can be corrected easily and it is not the case of the topic.

Question. Is it exactly the same variety as in the article

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note206253.html
where the Variety section gives
? [omitted] (fr) 9.3 sign. sans barre fractionnaire
that is the fractional prefix without dividing line

?

If so it is a better to inform, that the collector must put his banknote in both articles.

Instead of all the waffle at the top, why not just ask for these two pages to be combined, as the presence or absence of a dividing line in the "fractional" prefix is not sufficient to justify separate pages?