Hello! I wanted today to add to the catalogue & share with all NUMISTA members 2 photos of an extremely rare banknote (pattern) which are not on the site. I couldn't do so because: when I opened the edit page of the item and clicked on CHOOSE A PHOTO only my phone's camera opens AND NOT ALSO THE GALLERY WHERE I HAVE STOCKED THOSE PHOTOS! Please,what shall I do in this case?!? Thanks!
I tried it today I with my phone for the first time and I got a field where you select the app that should open with such requests. You probably chose your camera app instead of your data app or gallery so you have to look in your settings to reset the preference.
Yes,thank you,I know what you say but that doesn't work with the NUMISTA site! I also found in time web pages of other sites which open options(camera,gallery) for such type of actions. But not all: NUMISTA among those who open only the camera option.
So,if for my phone it works or not,depending on the site I acces,I don't think I have to change some settings(I never changed such settings,by the way ; I don't know even if there are such settings & were they are in the phone's menu).
Can you help me more? Because I have some other interesting items which are not in NUMISTA catalogue!
On the EDIT PAGE of the item I want to add new photos,when I click the sensitive case CHOOSE FILE,only the option of the camera appears,instead of the gallery as well.
Hi,Hibernia! Thanks for your try to help,I checked all the browser's settings and found no such permission to allow there…
Plus,as I already said above,some sites which require such actions open camera + gallery options but other sites do not,only camera! With same settings! Among these last ones is also NUMISTA,unfortunately. I don't know what makes the difference between the 2 types of sites,ACTING IN THE SAME CONDITIONS!!!
Hi,dear Lipstreamed! Yes,I also saw the official post,thanks for your work but why is the photo of one side so small? My photos were the same size for both sides. Now,very little can be seen,even enlarged. That can't be changed?!/
Hi,dear Lipstreamed! Yes,I also saw the official post,thanks for your work but why is the photo of one side so small? My photos were the same size for both sides. Now,very little can be seen,even enlarged. That can't be changed?!/
Adni…They both look fine. Same size.
I do have one question though. I don't believe The Pick numbers P#75 and P#75p actually exist. Were they added for this change?
Hello,rsirian1! NOW the pictures are of the same size,2 hours ago one of them was much more small.
OF COURSE,THE PICTURES REALY EXISTS,(I MADE THEM YESTERDAY) AS WELL THE BANKNOTE: IT IS THE ‘’JEWEL OF CROWN'' OF MY COLLECTION!!!
About 30 years ago I saw only one other piece at a very old collector who died in times past. Don'know now were his piece is! Different serial number than mine. Another piece I only saw in an encyclopedic romanian book. Also with another serial number.
Hello,rsirian1! NOW the pictures are of the same size,2 hours ago one of them was much more small.
OF COURSE,THE PICTURES REALY EXISTS,(I MADE THEM YESTERDAY) AS WELL THE BANKNOTE: IT IS THE ‘’JEWEL OF CROWN'' OF MY COLLECTION!!!
About 30 years ago I saw only one other piece at a very old collector who died in times past. Don'know now were his piece is! Different serial number than mine. Another piece I only saw in an encyclopedic romanian book. Also with another serial number.
Regardless of all that, (I make no judgement on the validity of your banknote or your reasoning) one cannot just go about making up Pick numbers that don't exist just because they think they should exist. P#75 and P#75p should be removed from the Varieties lines (or have them added to SCWPM). Only P#75s is a valid number.
Dear Hibernia,the banknote is rarissime to ''unique'': Even the National Romanian Museum of History in Bucharest doesn't have this series of 4 pattern denominations: 10;50;200;2000 lei 1920 The most valuable and rare of all 4 is this of 2000 lei & with most beautiful design.
The numismatic collection of The Romanian Academy had all complete series of 4 but all those were ‘’lost'' during the comunist goverment in my country (1945-1989).
About the other 2 pieces I saw,the one in the book's photo seemed to be Unc. & the piece of the old collector even a bit better préservation than mine AU-UNC.
p75 is correct, scwpm General 16th Ed, p 1038. I checked it just now.
75p is a proof
75s is a specimen
I check Bank Note Museum and PMG which only show P75s. If those sites are wrong and the other 2 are really in SCWPM, I apologize for being out of date.
Regardless of all that, (I make no judgement on the validity of your banknote or your reasoning) one cannot just go about making up Pick numbers that don't exist just because they think they should exist. P#75 and P#75p should be removed from the Varieties lines (or have them added to SCWPM). Only P#75s is a valid number.
I'm glad your picture fixed itself.
I fixed the picture. The original listing already existed, so those variety lines already were there. Looks like Hibernia checked SCWPM and they all check out. Oops, I posted too slow.
Please see,you all,that the SC of WB gives a market value of 5000 usd for the punched specimen and mentions with no price the existance of a few known pieces ''in issued form''.
