Mint: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/mint.php?id=296
I mention the referees of Bolivia to review or correct this request: @adanieluy @infierno
In Numista this mint has the name of the city (Potosi) and reading the guidelines https://en.numista.com/help/add-or-modify-a-mint-in-the-catalogue-189.html I assume that the rule applied to name the mint was
If the name of the mint changed throughout its history, or if several minting facilities operated in a city without overlap, then only the hosting city appears in the title. The name changes are recorded in the description of the mint.
Reading different sources
https://www.museovirtualbo.com/categoria/numismatica/casa-de-la-moneda/
https://bolivianthoughts.com/2024/03/27/potosi-1773-mint-house-casa-de-la-moneda-250-years-anos/
https://www.si.edu/object/historia-de-la-real-casa-de-moneda-de-potosi-durante-la-dominacion-hispanica-1573-1825-arnaldo-j:siris_sil_606556
https://www.alejandrostojanovic.com/la-casa-de-la-moneda
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casa_de_la_Moneda_de_Bolivia
https://www.enumismatic.com/mints-history/potosi/es/la-ceca-de-potosi
https://archives.nypl.org/mss/484
https://www.bolivian.com/cnm/mon-rep.html
there were three mints:
- first Royal Mint of Potosi (ES: Real Casa de Moneda de Potosí) (1573-1773)
- second Royal Mint of Potosi (1773-1825)
- Potosi Mint (ES: Casa de Moneda de Potosí) (1825-1953)
(the sources differ in the first date: 1573 or 1574; I use https://www.museovirtualbo.com/categoria/numismatica/casa-de-la-moneda/)
Mint
Applying the above information, add or modify this data:
- Operation dates: 1573-1953
- Description (EN): There were three mints: the first Royal Mint of Potosi (1573-1773), the second Royal Mint of Potosi (1773-1825), and the Potosi Mint (1825-1953).
Mintmarks
Sources:
https://www.enumismatic.com/mints-history/potosi/es/la-ceca-de-potosi
https://www.museovirtualbo.com/categoria/numismatica/casa-de-la-moneda/
N#61953
N#28892