Comment in yearline disappears when adding signatures [solved]

I have used over half a day adding signatures on this banknote:

N#220900

And before I removed the signatures from the comment section, I wanted to see how it looked.

First it remove several signatures and referances I had added.

Second time it removes a couple of comments from the yearlines under Riim.

Same the third time and the Sieg SD code also disappear…

Fourth time it does the same, but only one yearline.

That's how I want to leave it for now, until someone has looked it it. It has so many yearlines and prefixes to keep track of and if I have to look more at it, with bugs, I'm gonna cry 🥲

I'm looking in my Siegs book and can't figure out which Ingerslevgaard it was, now the prefix is gone… I have compared and it doesn't look like any of the Riim & Ingerslevgaard issues are missing…

I haven't registered any duplicate of that signature, though there were plenty of other duplicated yearlines, I will like merged in a later post.

The good thing is, I can quickly check, if one has missed their comment line, since it will float to the top of the signature of the relevandt "Head of the banknote department".

Can @dzmitry.huletski  help? Also with the history of the yearline(s)?

Related/similar to this? https://en.numista.com/forum/topic149687.html

Maybe? This is less related to the signatures added at least. Even after the signature is added and I don't touch it, the comment still disappear…

Well hopefully this one will be solved as fast as the other one.

I still don't understand why we need every little block letter combination. Just make a list of all the pairs and add the possible prefixes in the comments like AA-AÆ or if that would be to long because of missing letters etc add a table in the comment section where there is more space.

Person A + Person B: AA-AH; AJ-AV; AX-AZ etc. or similar

But I understand your pain with signatures. I am in the process of adding German Empire signatures and they have the whole board of directors (up to 15 people) on them. Reducing the comments width to s single character. 😅 

I'm just worker with what I inherited from my predececcor.

But I think it's because not all directors signed all prefixes. Siegs Seddelkatalog, my main source have a pretty comprehensible table with all the signatures and prefixes.

Many of the Danes who collect banknotes I know will like to have one of each prefix and signature combination, so that can also be a part of it..?

Yeah, I was about to scream, when I saw the length of the page and cry when the bug happened. Half a day's work, maybe gone! 😅

I just wanted to add some to the main comment section of the page and not touching the yearlines at all, ont he 5 Kroner note 

N#220900

And then 3 referances disappared and two more comments in the yearlines… I'm tired… It's quite demotivating to add hundreds of signatures to a banknote, just to see something as essential as prefixes to dissappear and having to look thruge my books to figure out what's missing or if womthing else went wrong… Why don't we have a yearline historic..?!

Can developer @dzmitry.huletski or @Xavier  please tell me something, before I add more signatures, which will just remove essential commentlines (as prefixes are very essential to the yearlines of Danish Banknotes) or try to fix the bug, just for new ones to happen…

Hi @Jamtrup,

Please could you provide the bug description formatted the following way so that I can reproduce and understand the problem:

1. Starting point;
2. Exact steps to reproduce (the shortest and simplest way you can reproduce the issue consistently, please describe your actions in detail, e.g. adding “X*X” text to the field “Comment”, etc);
3.  Expected result;
4. Actual result.

If you could record a screen video, it would help even more.

For this one:

I added the signatures and P# and then clicked on the "Modify data" button and some of the referances are gone and the comments in the yearlines.

When I'm adding the comment back and the referances and then modify data, then some new coments/referances are gone and I have to look thruge the books again, to figure them out.

Can't we get yearline historics? For the 5 Kroner note the problem happened on, there are a few yearlines, which appear more than once and I haven't asked to have them merged yet, so if the comment there disappears, it will just be utter chaos…

@Jamtrup Applied a fix ✔️ 

A problem disappeared for me (the second one probably too).

Please kindly check on your side and confirm.

I think it works now too. Will test a bit around with it too and get back if that's not the case. Thanks :D

I assume you just want me to reject the modification requests you made as testers?