See more for auction results

What about adding See more for auction results

N#147982

as it's done for Exemples?

What's not being shown?

A link See more for every Auction result

You see more when you click the link already there.  What more would be added?

Every exemple has a see more link pointing to 

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/examples.php?id=147982#example_######

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/examples.php?id=147982#example_18968

I would like to have for every Past result shown a See more link pointing to https://en.numista.com/catalogue/past_sales.php?id=147982#pastsale_######

OK. I just think the See more past sales link already there suffices.  I would remove the see more on each example so you could actually see more of each example and just use the See the examples link below them to see more. The same link on every example and on every past sales just clutters things up unnecessarily.  Why have all these links that are the same as the one link?

I agree it would be an improvement

@rsirian1 what about choosing a single layout both for Examples and Past results?

I like more the compact layout of Examples

When I look at the past sales it's usually looking for a particular year line and grade.  Right now it's ordered by year line then by grade so it's easy to scroll quickly to what I want.  It would depend on what info is in the compact layout and how it's laid out if it would still be better for me. Of course, I could hit the See more link to get back to the chronologically ordered list.  So…I can make either work for what I want.

please check also reference numbers: they are missing from the page Examples of the type

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/examples.php?id=472194

N#472194

In the compact view Numista includes the year line reference. In the See more view for some reason Numista ignores the year line reference. That needs to be fixed.

Also, I couldn't help noticing that in the compact view  

those reverences would be readable if not being overridden with the (see more). That's one of the reason I suggested earlier to remove them.