Please merge that mess. All missing year-lines will be added afterwards.
1)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces8223.html
2)
» Quick access to the last post
Please merge that mess. All missing year-lines will be added afterwards.
1)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces8223.html
2)
So the proposal is to end with two “tête nue” (bareheaded) listings, one we could call “short bust” and the other “tall bust”?
Or maybe I'm missing something since I dont know this series.
tdziemia
So the proposal is to end with two “tête nue” (bareheaded) listings, one we could call “short bust” and the other “tall bust”?
Or maybe I'm missing something since I dont know this series.
There are a total of 4 bust types for this reverse type. These above are two of them.
tdziemia
@Goldxi65 @Eagle68 OK for you to combine the Henry II teston types as proposed by Trooper8?
@Compendium is the relevant one, no?
I confirm thanks
SOrry! I will work on it.
For 1)
… it looks like we should keep N#123772 since it is more complete.
In moving the members from dates 1554M, 1555M and 1560M from N#8223 should they go to the line for mintmaster Catellan or mintmaster Robert?
Also, let me know what to do with the line for 1553 I (Limoges). I see that there is a “short bust” version of this date/mint as Dupl. 984: https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1525905 but also a “tall bust” version as Dupl 983: https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=13016786
Well, I don't know either 😅
But are there really members on these year-lines? Does it even matter?
Trooper8
Well, I don't know either 😅
But are there really members on these year-lines? Does it even matter?
Yes, unfortunately at least one member on each line.
Will wait for feedback from @Compendium . And meanwhile I will work on the next group which looks like there is no problem with “overlap.”
tdziemia
For 1)
… it looks like we should keep N#123772 since it is more complete.
In moving the members from dates 1554M, 1555M and 1560M from N#8223 should they go to the line for mintmaster Catellan or mintmaster Robert?
As there is no way for us to know, please move collections to Undetermined version. It's a known fact Numista has no “partially undetermined subversions” like having mint but no date or else.
Also, let me know what to do with the line for 1553 I (Limoges). I see that there is a “short bust” version of this date/mint as Dupl. 984: https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1525905 but also a “tall bust” version as Dupl 983: https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=13016786
Consider it is Dy R 983
Thanks!
Used time zone is UTC+2:00.
Current time is 11:11.