I picked up two coins today from Annam. It was a region of Viet-nam. I don't see them either in the KM World Coins catalogue or in our catalogue.
I will identify them. One is a Dong from the Minh Mang period (1820 to 1841). It has a catalogue number: C.81.1 (although I don't know what catalogue that is).
The other is a coin from the Gia Long period (1802-1820). It looks like any non-descript cash coin but most and closely resemble C# 61.2.
Quote: Matt ProbertAnnam was never a "region of Vietnam", rather it was a country occupying roughly the area now known as Vietnam and surrounding areas.
You can get a good idea of the region known as Annam from this old map:
The World Coins Catalogue (KM) lists these two coins under Viet-Nam. According to their description, after the French conquered Dai Nam (as the country was then called) it split the country into three parts, the South was Cochin; the North was Tonkin and the central was Annam. Annam is where the Emperors were allowed to have their capital, Hue. Now we do call Tonkin a separate country for coin listing purposes, but not Annam for some reason. I could see it being called "Protectorate of Annam" just like we have "Protectorate of Tonkin."
Just read a bit more history on this region from Krause:
207 BC - Chinese general set up Kingdom of Nam-Viet on the Red River
111 BC - Kingdom overthrown by Chinese under Han Dynasty, became Chinese called Giao-Chi
Name later changed to Annam or peaceful or pacified South
968 AD - Chinese rule ended, Vietnam (?) becomes independent
1407 - Chinese again invade
1428 - Chinese again driven out, country becomes independent and named Dai-Viet
1802 - Country renamed Dai Nam by Gia Long
1885 - French invade and split the country into 3 parts
North becomes Protectorate of Tonkin, Central becomes Protectorate of Annam,
South becomes Colony of Cochin China (as Matt's map of 1896)
Thus, the coins we were looking at in the beginning are from the country of Dai Nam.
(This is all according to Krause, so there is a possibility it's not entirely accurate!)
Just because you can't see it ... doesn't mean it isn't there - Anon.