neilithic
Closed account
Posted: 13 Mart 2015, 09:28
#
Posted: 13 Mart 2015, 09:28
#
VF? Better? Worse?
radrick007
Joined: 7 Şub 2011
Posts: 3048
Posted: 13 Mart 2015, 13:23
#
Posted: 13 Mart 2015, 13:23
#
Something seems to have gone awry with your newly found linking skills, Neil.
Just because you can't see it ... doesn't mean it isn't there - Anon.
Former coin and banknote catalogue referee.
ArnoV
Translator
Joined: 23 Kas 2011
Posts: 1348
Posted: 13 Mart 2015, 16:30
#
Posted: 13 Mart 2015, 16:30
#
Nice catch!
I'd say VF+ or XF-. I suppose it's pretty hard to get Victorian coins in a decent grade (VF or better).
bam777
Joined: 5 Ağu 2011
Posts: 4414
Posted: 13 Mart 2015, 16:49
#
Posted: 13 Mart 2015, 16:49
#
I'd probably give that a straight VF.
neilithic
Closed account
Posted: 13 Mart 2015, 20:18
#
Posted: 13 Mart 2015, 20:18
#
Nothing wrong with my skills Rad...there has been an issue on this site for the last week with the pictures not showing up. It seems to have been resolved now though
tony_k_1965
Joined: 8 Kas 2011
Posts: 1690
Posted: 14 Mart 2015, 02:25
#
Posted: 14 Mart 2015, 02:25
#
obv vf, rev -xf. downside it has been cleaned. Still a very nice coin
neilithic
Closed account
Posted: 14 Mart 2015, 07:12
#
Posted: 14 Mart 2015, 07:12
#
thanks for the input guys
Used time zone is UTC+2:00. Current time is 22:03.