cyprusalexander
Joined: 4 Kas 2013
Posts: 929
Posted: 28 Nis 2016, 23:01
#
Posted:
#
Who can explain the reason to keep special article for the token
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces51489.html
with 20 mm and 5.15 g mass
separately from
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces23417.html
and not to include it into the second article? In this case it is enough to add these data into one more line, is not?
Or maybe the reason is that, there is difference between "Two ancors" in the first article and "Two anchors" in the second?
Alexander from Cyprus
eucoins.byethost9.com
My suggestions
https://t.me/enjoyyourcollection
Andy289
Joined: 12 Mart 2013
Posts: 1537
Posted: 28 Nis 2016, 23:06
#
Posted:
#
It's a duplicate page, one of them should be deleted.
cyprusalexander
Joined: 4 Kas 2013
Posts: 929
Posted: 29 Nis 2016, 07:13
#
Posted:
#
It is not so simple.
1. The first article's token is not described in the second one.
2. The second article has personal notes of a referee in the years distribution apart of the size and mass.
Alexander from Cyprus
eucoins.byethost9.com
My suggestions
https://t.me/enjoyyourcollection
Jarcek
Numista team
Joined: 22 Ara 2014
Posts: 16166
Posted: 29 Nis 2016, 09:20
#
Posted:
#
I also believe it is duplicate - I would say that TK-0018: 5.23g 21 mm matches first coin sheet, but It would like someone from Turkey to tell us.
Catalogue administrator
Used time zone is UTC+2:00.
Current time is 02:39.