I love statistics so it certainly isn't a bad idea in itself.
But:
QuoteJapoivvb
It would give us an idea
- how hard is to get this coin in the swap e.g. this coin was never swapped https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces14302.html so probably if you want it , you must go shopping.
A much easier and more accurate way is to just look at the coin page and see how many times a specific coin is offered in swap lists. That tells you much more than a number. Besides, to see that number you already have to go to the coin page so you can immediately see who has the coin you're looking for in his swap list. And then you can also see which dates are available for swapping while the number only gives an indication about the type of the coin, not about the dates.
QuoteJapoivvb
It would give us an idea
- other factor to balance the swaps, for same "rarity index" the "swap index" could decide if the coin is really easy or hard to get.
The "swap index" doesn't mean anything for this matter. The most common coins will have a very high "swap index" (assuming like the "rarity index" a high number means little swaps and a low number means many swaps) because (almost) everybody will have these kind of coins. But that high swap index" indicates it's a hard to get coin while it's just the opposite.
Because a high "swap index" can mean both very hard and very easy to get, the "swap index" can't serve as a factor to balance a swap.
Besides there are too many factors influencing the "swap index": coins from certain countries are much more sought after than other countries, so these coins will have a lower "swap index" which means they are easier to get, but because everyone is looking for these coins they are harder to get.
My opinion: the "swap index" can be an interesting statistic feature, but nothing more than that, that number hasn't any reliability for other purposes.