Highest possible number is 97; that means one Numista member claims to own it. 100 means 0 Numista members do.
There should be a way to sort through your collection by NRI, if we're going to keep it around; but here are some of my 90's NRI coins:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces24177.html
NRI 95, apparently me and one other person have this 17,000 mintage 1794 revolutionary Genevoise, a big silver coin. No pictures of it on my laptop yet...
Silver coins were among the first coins ever used, thousands of years ago. The silver standard was used for centuries in many places of the world. And the use of silver for coins, instead of other materials, has many reasons.
I think I have two or three coins that are 97 because I added them myself? Plus a few more that aren't 97 any more (this South Georgia commemorative is now all the way down to 92).
I do have at least two coins with NRI 97 that I didn't add myself: this Spanish Netherlands peerdeke and this Shirvanshah tanka (the latter being, as far as I can tell, their only listed coin, which technically makes "Shirvanshah dynasty" my rarest issuer).
I buy nummus every month : it's easier to find one that is not on numista yet than one who has already been added on the catalog, so I got plenty of 97 rarity index with them.
Except that, I got the following ones in NRI 97 (nothing really valuable however) :
I have dozens of NRI 97 coins (no tokens). The last few years I've added 91 new coins to the catalogue. A lot of them still have NRI 97. Among them the Fiji,1 dollar 2010 FIAA World Cup - South Africa tri-metallic series, consisting of 10 coins. All 10 still have NRI 97.
Quote: "Essor Prof"I have dozens of NRI 97 coins (no tokens). The last few years I've added 91 new coins to the catalogue. A lot of them still have NRI 97. Among them the Fiji,1 dollar 2010 FIAA World Cup - South Africa tri-metallic series, consisting of 10 coins. All 10 still have NRI 97.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces78195.html
Quote: "Essor Prof"I have dozens of NRI 97 coins (no tokens). The last few years I've added 91 new coins to the catalogue. A lot of them still have NRI 97. Among them the Fiji,1 dollar 2010 FIAA World Cup - South Africa tri-metallic series, consisting of 10 coins. All 10 still have NRI 97.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces78195.html
What a lovely coin !
The whole world cup set from South Africa is super nice! Have you seen the zoo medal in the coins and valuations forum too? Looks awesome. I need more animals.
It seems like the one from the Archbishopric of Riga has not yet been validated. This was the first time I checked that page's status in a while, but it has been a couple months since I requested it...
coming in with a NRI of 91 is my 1855 Australia Merchant token/Penny https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces59315.html. Funny thing is ever since i was a kid I thought it was some novelty souvenir (like those giant buffalo "nickels") wasnt until i looked it up on numista that i discovered what it was.
Tied for my highest index circulated coin at only 81: I have several token and exonumia 97's but they were submitted by me so no surprise there. And an ancient Greek coin that has been awaiting verification since December, took me hours on the internet to find just one example so it's not common, but also an AE11 so boring.. But the "81" for no-stars half dime includes the 1837-P with 20 times the number as the 1838-O. PCGS estimates just 200 in existence for all grades, still so happy I got one!
Quote: "ArnoV"My rarest is my avatar coin, an 1874 Stuiver from Curaçao with a NRI of 94.
It is actually not a coin nor a token but rather 'emergency coinage'.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces28632.html
Did you know that your token is also listed in Rulau's "Latin American Tokens" (2nd ed., page 165), as Rulau Cur11? He says the Leyba tokens are harder to find than the contemporary Jesurun and Naar tokens.
Quote: "halfdisme"Did you know that your token is also listed in Rulau's "Latin American Tokens" (2nd ed., page 165), as Rulau Cur11? He says the Leyba tokens are harder to find than the contemporary Jesurun and Naar tokens.
I didn't know, but I'm also not really trying to hunt down the other two. It is true that the tokens are very rarely seen on offer.
On Numista, the Jesurun token has an NRI of 91, so it's slightly more common than the Leyba and Naar tokens, which have an NRI of 94.
(I walked into a coin shop that usually has very little world coinage. This time, he had an accumulation of Philippines coins, including 4 quartos (1826-1830) and a 4 pesos gold coin!)
Quote: "Jangofett56037"A rare chinese commerative coin of the emporor nurhachi 92 last i checked . Also have a few ancient coins, but i cant determine what they are
Hate to be the one saying this but that's just a modern privately produced token for tourists. I've seen the whole set of "commemorative" coins of Qing emperors being sold online, and while it may have a high NRI don't be fooled into thinking it's an old dynastic silver commemorative....
I only asked them a couple of weeks ago and already its there.
It replaced a fairly worn coin shown on that page.
I love coins. Especially silver, gold and anything really old.
Member of the Royal Numismatic Society of New Zealand and the Auckland Numismatic Society
Quote: "ElectronJohn"I have this Drachm - Amisos.
I have owned it for 3 years but just added it to this site today. It has a 100 rarity index right now.
Well, 97.
100 means that no one has it. If you assign a newly added coin to your collection, it is 100 yet the database updates a bit later making the rarity index 97.
Quote: "ElectronJohn"I have this Drachm - Amisos.
I have owned it for 3 years but just added it to this site today. It has a 100 rarity index right now.
Well, 97.
100 means that no one has it. If you assign a newly added coin to your collection, it is 100 yet the database updates a bit later making the rarity index 97.
Yes I figured it would drop once the database updated (and it has) which is why I said "right now". So for a brief moment in time I did have a coin with a rarity index of 100! No matter what else 2020 throws at me I will always have that.
Quote: "ElectronJohn"I have this Drachm - Amisos.
I have owned it for 3 years but just added it to this site today. It has a 100 rarity index right now.
Well, 97.
100 means that no one has it. If you assign a newly added coin to your collection, it is 100 yet the database updates a bit later making the rarity index 97.
Yes I figured it would drop once the database updated (and it has) which is why I said "right now". So for a brief moment in time I did have a coin with a rarity index of 100! No matter what else 2020 throws at me I will always have that.
That's a beautiful drachm, John. Its beauty is much more important than its Numista rarity index :)
I didn't realize how many tokens were listed on this site. Wow. I have a bunch from different video arcades when I was a kid which I will now have to enter.
Quote: "ElectronJohn"I didn't realize how many tokens were listed on this site. Wow. I have a bunch from different video arcades when I was a kid which I will now have to enter.
Most of mine came from family in Italy and the US. They’re not too common in the UK these days from what I’ve seen...
These are all of my coins over 90 NRI (22 coins). Also 1 isn't listed on Numista so i'd say its 100. It's listed in Kruase German catalog but without a picture snagged it for $20! It is a Brunswick Wolfenbuttel 1/8 thaler commemorating the death of Duke Heinrich Julius its silver and about in between the size of a US quarter and a half dollar.
Quote: "German_empire5_mark_fan"These are all of my coins over 90 NRI (22 coins). Also 1 isn't listed on Numista so i'd say its 100. It's listed in Kruase German catalog but without a picture snagged it for $20! It is a Brunswick Wolfenbuttel 1/8 thaler commemorating the death of Duke Heinrich Julius its silver and about in between the size of a US quarter and a half dollar.
You should add that Brunswick Wolfenbuttel 1/8 thaler to Numista! I would like to see pictures of it. All of the coins you listed are outstanding by the way.
These Australian dollar coins are all NCLT and are larger, thicker and heavier than the standard size dollar coin that the Royal Australian Mint produce. In theory you could spend them in a shop as they are legal tender but I'm sure you would get some shopkeepers questioning their validity.
Cheers Mike
Master Referee - See my profile for what I collect.
Just an AA token I bought and added myself at 95 rarity, one of these days I'll hire a token company to make some and the only way to get them will be to swap with me.
Quote: "German_empire5_mark_fan"These are all of my coins over 90 NRI (22 coins). Also 1 isn't listed on Numista so i'd say its 100. It's listed in Kruase German catalog but without a picture snagged it for $20! It is a Brunswick Wolfenbuttel 1/8 thaler commemorating the death of Duke Heinrich Julius its silver and about in between the size of a US quarter and a half dollar.
You should add that Brunswick Wolfenbuttel 1/8 thaler to Numista! I would like to see pictures of it. All of the coins you listed are outstanding by the way.
Thanks,
I also have dozens of tokens in the 80s and 90s for NRI but haven't had the chance to add them yet.
WOW! I had to make an account after this happened to me. Picked up a 1887 Victoria 3 pence coin, looked very tarnished in the capsule it came in, I didn't notice the markings on the back of it in the pictures when I bought it, and it was cheap. When I got it, it measured 13mm and not 16mm.. Well, it turns out it was a Lauer imitation coin, made in Nuremberg Germany and it actually looks much better than the picture of the coin on Numista, so if you want, please use mine, its in much better shape! It has a rarity rating of 93 and I thought I was receiving a common coin.. I was thinking of returning it to the seller, but after realizing its extremely rare, I think I'm gonna either keep it or resell it!! I think it might be made of either brass or copper.. What do you all think?
Even the guy who sold it to me didn't know what he was selling.. I need a better camera. Thoughts??
Would like better pictures than those two though.
Too dark, in holder, and especially the first picture is cut off at the base.
So would need them:
out of holder
in daylight, ideally outside
complete circle
Thanks.
I have many 97s, checked just now and indeed, I cannot find any with 100. I quite like this 97, celebratory silver proof with € fantasy currency from Norway: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/exonumia241709.html
2022 It's dropped to 90 and suggests that 8 people own them now
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces224715.html
Mine is the only one, but image is not of my coin (Too worn and possible mine is not genuine).
2022: It's still 97 and the image is a generic auction site example
I also have a 91 with my Commonwealth Halfcrown
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces12951.html
It's scarce, but with 11 potential dates, it means that a few other people are bound to have them.
The Commonwealth coin has dropped to 90!! Someone else must have bought one.
Not a 90, but was glad when Numista accepted my coin as a new index coin for their page
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces21633.html
I only asked them a couple of weeks ago and already its there.
It replaced a fairly worn coin shown on that page.
I also now have a 100 coin
1696 English Halfcrown, Bristol Mintmark, NOT listed on Numista (Yet)
It seems there is only a handful of us interested in late Stuart silver coins?
My guess with numbering
100 = unlisted coin
97 = 1 numista member owns it
95 = 2 people own it
93 = 3 or 4 people
91 = 5 or 6 people own it
90 = 7 - 9 people own it
89 = 10 to 12 people own it
3 = Up to 50,000 members own it
2 = Over 50,000 members own it (American pennies and French 1 franc coins dated 1960 - 2001)
I love coins. Especially silver, gold and anything really old.
Member of the Royal Numismatic Society of New Zealand and the Auckland Numismatic Society
I collect some obscure places that not many people care about, so I have a lot of NRI 97 coins. Many of these I have entered in the catalog within the last year, so those numbers will go down over time, but some have been in the catalog for years.
I haven't looked through Polish-Lithuania Commonwealth yet, which is nearly 30% of my collection, but there are so many common types there I don't expect to find any 97 NRI ...
I have quite extensive collection of Russian wire coins and added lots of them in the catalog. I guess some of them with NRI 97 are even available for swap:)
My personal list of scammers from Numista: erniemix, yvain, CassTaylor
Quote: "tdziemia"I collect some obscure places that not many people care about, so I have a lot of NRI 97 coins. Many of these I have entered in the catalog within the last year, so those numbers will go down over time, but some have been in the catalog for years.
wow tdziemia, congrats, I clicked on the links, the philip the rider, blew me away. 👏👏
Quote: "FredStewart"I don't have many rare coins, but my father has a "rare" commemorative silver medal.
The Stewart Society - 250th Anniversary of the '45 Rising
Numista Rarity index: 100
150 minted
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/exonumia317457.html
The reason I say "rare" in quotes is that the Society still sells them. They aren't minting more, they just haven't sold all of them since 1995. They aren't very well-known.
Quote: "tdziemia"I collect some obscure places that not many people care about, so I have a lot of NRI 97 coins. Many of these I have entered in the catalog within the last year, so those numbers will go down over time, but some have been in the catalog for years.
wow tdziemia, congrats, I clicked on the links, the philip the rider, blew me away. 👏👏
My coin is not as attractive as our catalog photo . It's a great strength of our catalog that we can choose great photos of each coin!
As we all know, an NRI of 97 (or even 100) does not necessarily mean the coin is "rare" by most numismatic standards. Also, I noticed that many of the coins mentioned in the first few posts of this thread have seen decreases in their NRI since they were posted (a great sign for the health of Numista, but maybe a disappointment to the people who made those posts).
To me, a rare coin is one that comes up for public sale anywhere in the world less frequently than once per year.
Very few of my NRI 97 coins meet that standard. The Philip "rider" coin is relatively "common" for a medieval gold. My rarest coin is one of my German States coins. Even that one is not very valuable because very few collectors want it.
I have some reasonably rare coins but a far few medals and medallion's that are very rare one example is my Curzon Wyllie commemorative medal with a rarity of 97.I only know of one other that went to auction in the early 2000s.
It has the highest NRI in my collection and it is the oldest as well.
Funny story about this coin, I actually found it in a supermarket on the floor, no idea how it got there. It was/is stored inside one of these coin frames.
For coins it’s this one with an index of 97 although the coin was only added to Numista a few weeks ago so it would take time for members who own it to find it on Numista.
I do have this Japanese 100 Yen banknote with an index of 87. Also I have at least 4 Exonumia with the index of 97.
Hi to whoever is reading this. Did you know that TYPEWRITER (on a QWERTY keyboard) is the longest word you can type using only the letters on one row of the keyboard.
I couldn't find the exact coin on Numista, but the closet one to the coin I own that I found is an 87 on rarity. It is a Mongolian silver dirham from the 1300s.
Just an observation - as the number of members goes up, surely the rarity index should go up too.
A collector who added a coin to the catalogue in 2018 may well have found that he is the only person on the website with that coin. Apparently, the rarity index figure given in 2018 for one person having that coin was 97. But what is that figure of 97 based upon? If it's a calculated figure, with substantially more members now than in 2018, surely the rarity index should be proportionately more - maybe 98 or 99. If it's arbitrary, why not 99.
It was 100 before I bought and listed my 3 copies of the coin, dragging down to 94.
I am also the first Numista member to have this big chunk o gold too
Me buying it bought it down to 97. Also only 300 were minted and how many coins do you have that come in carved chests?
Because of that number it will never drop below around 40 and likely 50 as Maori Tribal members own at least 40 of them of which their high chief has banned from selling on pain of a Maori curse (These coins have numbers too and fortunately mine is not one of them - which means I live - Maori magic scares me a bit more being part Maori myself).
The moral, if you buy or have a Numista 100 coin, listing it drops it to 97 and more than 1 of the coin drops it further.
I love coins. Especially silver, gold and anything really old.
Member of the Royal Numismatic Society of New Zealand and the Auckland Numismatic Society
1000 Yen - Heisei 150 Rarity of 90% though most won't consider it rare it is actually illegal to export these from or import them to Japan in order to maintain the order limit Japan mint places on collector coins.
Note- I appear to have deleted my picture of the Japan mint seal that states it forbids reimportation so here's a coa instead.
Just an observation - as the number of members goes up, surely the rarity index should go up too.
A collector who added a coin to the catalogue in 2018 may well have found that he is the only person on the website with that coin. Apparently, the rarity index figure given in 2018 for one person having that coin was 97. But what is that figure of 97 based upon? If it's a calculated figure, with substantially more members now than in 2018, surely the rarity index should be proportionately more - maybe 98 or 99. If it's arbitrary, why not 99.
As the number of numista members increses, the likelihood that there is one more member with a given coin should increase, which would make the numista rarity index LOWER, not higher.
(As best I can tell from the FAQ information, there is no denominator in the Numista rarity index.)
Of my last 10 acquisitions, I have 3 with a Numista rarity index of 97, one with a 95, and two at 100 because they are not yet listed. (Not because I like to acquire rare coins, but because nobody else on Numista likes to collect the coins that I like to collect! 😄)
Just an observation - as the number of members goes up, surely the rarity index should go up too.
…
I don't think this logic is correct.
As the number of numista members increases, the likelihood that there is one more member with a given coin should increase, which would make the numista rarity index LOWER, not higher.
Of my last 10 acquisitions, I have 3 with a Numista rarity index of 97, one with a 95, and two at 100 because they are not yet listed. ..
+1
The rarity index will only decrease as more members join & enter more coins/notes.
The rarity index for that 100 Yen note is now 83 (down 4 points since February 2023).
The rarity index (RI) is a helpful feature here but it should be taken with a grain of salt. If you like to collect tough signature varieties (like I do) then you will discover notes like the Bank of Canada 1937 $5 with a RI of 52 which is pretty low & common. But the first Osborne signature (P-60a) only makes up 3% of all entries & it is almost an impossible note to find. I'm sure there are a lot of collectors out there who like to find the one tough variety amongst a common coin/note.
Of my last 10 acquisitions, I have 3 with a Numista rarity index of 97, one with a 95, and two at 100 because they are not yet listed. (Not because I like to acquire rare coins, but because nobody else on Numista likes to collect the coins that I like to collect! 😄)
Exactly this. I have over 100 pieces of Numista RI of 100, because I added them to the catalog, I don't log my collection in Numista, and no one but me is interested in the stuff I collect! 🤓
Jamais l'or n'a perdu la plus petite occasion de se montrer stupide. -Balzac
The Numista Rarity Index is, IMHO, rather meaningless.
More recently added coins have a higher NRI.
This Canadian and this Australian faux-coins have NRI indices of 91 and 92 respectively. There are actually more Numista members who have these “coins” than the RCM and RAM issued…
On individual coin pages, many type collectors click on the first row to add their new coins, whatever year or variety.
It wouldn't surprise me a bit if many owners of rare and expensive coins don't add them to their Numista checklist so as not to tempt thieves.
In the case of exonumia, there is so much of it out there, and much of it of low value, that there probably is less of an incentive to add such items compared to circulating coins. This is actually my case. So few of the exonumia items I happen to have are in the database that I have not added them systematically as it makes little difference.
I think I understand what LDC63 was getting at when he wrote
as the number of members goes up, surely the rarity index should go up too.
If you think about it, if you had a coin at NRI 97 when there were 100,000 members, and if you're still the only member with that coin now that there are 200,000+ members, in theory the coin is now twice as rare as it was when there were half the members. But as we know, it actually works only in the number of coins reported by members. A single reported coin produces an index of 97, whether there are 100k or 200k members.
Altogether, the NRI is probably somewhat more accurate (or less inaccurate) for modern circulating coins.
I remember seeing it explained on a couple of times on the forum (once by FrenchLover if my memory serves me well, either on the French or English side) but can't remember exactly what the reason was, and it's not explained on this dedicated page. Perhaps a note could be added about that? Yet here are some points made on the page:
The Numista Rarity Index is computed from the number of members that have it in their collection and the number of members who offer it for swap. Note that collections from Numista users are not verified so they can't be fully trusted. Multiple entries by the same user are not taken into account to build the index.
The Numista Rarity Index provides a good indication of how easy it would be to obtain an item from another Numista member. So an item with an index lower than 10 is fairly easy to get, while an item with an index greater than 30 will be harder to get in a swap, as not many people have it in the first place.
To be short, the Numista Rarity Index is an indicator of how frequently a coin, a banknote or a piece of exonumia is found within the collection of Numista members. Nothing else.
And, about exonumia:
Exonumia items tend to have a higher Numista Rarity Index because only a small part of the members collect them.
why does it got 97 on the first instance, instead of 99?
It's a mathematical function with multiple additional factors that approaches 0 in infinity. It falls very fast in the beginning and slowly at the end.