grading dirty coins

11 posts

» Quick access to the last post

Hello all, i'm having a little difficulty grading dirty coins (no probs with clean ones) so i have uploaded pics of 1926 french 1 franc if anyone can help or advise thanks.

whats dirty about that coin??? :D
james
It's all about the scratches and details, not about dirt, so i rate it XF.
ture but still a a nice coin :)
james
kommodore is right, the presence of dirt or tarnish would not generally affect the grade of a coin. It is about circulation wear and detail, or the loss of it, and can be quite difficult to establish an exact grade since two separate people may have differing opinions. I think yours is a beautiful coin but with some slight loss of detail to the higher points of the seated figure, in my opinion it would grade a good VF.
Just because you can't see it ... doesn't mean it isn't there - Anon.

Former coin and banknote catalogue referee.
:)
james
Yeah, I'm looking at this coin, and it doesn't show dirt.

I think the seated figure is a little too worn to be EF, although most details look sharp. I'd grade VF+
Kenny

- Verifying your Asian and British-territorial coins everyday with the best quality photos and the best information.

Check out my Facebook, Kenneth Gucyski.
It's almost 100 years old, be more generous. :)
Just cause a coin's old, doesn't mean an okay quality is good!

Maybe if I held it in my hand I could give it an EF. But think about it. You have a 1600's coin for example. It's well worn out that it's in G or VG. The condition is what it is. It would be unfair in this case for the UNC coin that is the same issue.
Kenny

- Verifying your Asian and British-territorial coins everyday with the best quality photos and the best information.

Check out my Facebook, Kenneth Gucyski.
Quote: SmartOneKgJust cause a coin's old, doesn't mean an okay quality is good!

Maybe if I held it in my hand I could give it an EF. But think about it. You have a 1600's coin for example. It's well worn out that it's in G or VG. The condition is what it is. It would be unfair in this case for the UNC coin that is the same issue.
 I have always wondered why old coins can get a "higher" grade when they are so worn? just because they are old is no reason to change your grading scale. I would agree with Smart One, the grading scale is the same for all coins, if not it would get really complicated and messy.
Taking a break from swapping for a while, but still interested in pre 1799 Spanish coins, I will make time for that!

Looking for pre 1783 coins
I don't think that old coins should receive high grading due to age, but one must know that older coin pressing technology didn't always produce as clean a coin as we see today. A person has to take into account the beginning product.   

» Forum policy

Used time zone is UTC+2:00.
Current time is 06:45.