VintageCoin
Joined: 5 Şub 2018
Posts: 167
Posted: 20 Haz 2019, 14:13
#
Posted: 20 Haz 2019, 14:13
#
Hello.
I've discovered this cent long time ago and now iam posting it here for verification..
The 200"6" i little weird from the other 2 cents with same date i have .. no damage done around or on the "6"
I think this might be mint error ...
Any expert opinions out there? (Euro collectors)
PetrusAscanus
Joined: 22 Kas 2014
Posts: 6304
Posted: 20 Haz 2019, 15:10
#
Posted: 20 Haz 2019, 15:10
#
The bottom of the 2nd 0 also has some damage that continues on the 6
Propably PMD
Non est totum quod splendet ut aurum
Rijkdom bestaat niet uit het hebben van veel bezittingen, maar in het hebben van weinig behoeften
VintageCoin
Joined: 5 Şub 2018
Posts: 167
Posted: 20 Haz 2019, 15:56
#
Posted: 20 Haz 2019, 15:56
#
Nah, on the picture it looks like the "2" is kinda cut, but in real life everything is normal exept the "6"
Mr. Midnight
Catalogue referee
Joined: 10 Mart 2017
Posts: 4329
Posted: 20 Haz 2019, 19:17
#
Posted: 20 Haz 2019, 19:17
#
looks like impact damage.
Impact is visible, as Petrus already said, also on the 0 next to the 6.
Jamais l'or n'a perdu la plus petite occasion de se montrer stupide. -Balzac
VintageCoin
Joined: 5 Şub 2018
Posts: 167
Posted: 24 Haz 2019, 20:58
#
Posted: 24 Haz 2019, 20:58
#
Anyone else thinking different or should i close this conversation ...
PetrusAscanus
Joined: 22 Kas 2014
Posts: 6304
Posted: 25 Haz 2019, 13:17
#
Posted: 25 Haz 2019, 13:17
#
Quote: "VintageCoin" Anyone else thinking different or should i close this conversation ...please close this topic...
Thanks for sharing
Non est totum quod splendet ut aurum
Rijkdom bestaat niet uit het hebben van veel bezittingen, maar in het hebben van weinig behoeften
Status changed to Solved
(VintageCoin , 25 Haz 2019, 15:58)
Used time zone is UTC+2:00. Current time is 14:38.