Duplicate listings (closed - please create new threads to report duplicates)
89 posts • viewed 438 times
» Quick access to the last post
Posted:
#
I expect banknote master referees are extremely busy at the moment but it would seem that some inferior, duplicate listings are getting past the verification process. For example, this later, inferior page is a duplicate of the original, superior page. Please delete the duplicate as and when the banknote catalogue admin can find the time. Many thanks 
Just because you can't see it ... doesn't mean it isn't there - Anon.
Former coin and banknote catalogue referee.
Former coin and banknote catalogue referee.
Sulfur
Catalogue referee
Joined: 11 Haz 2016
Posts: 3790
Posts: 3790
Posted: 26 Nis 2020, 02:40
#
Edited: 26 Nis 2020, 02:41
Edited: 26 Nis 2020, 02:41
Posted:
#
Edited:
Edited:
Thank you, everyone, for your patience.
All requests in this thread have been dealt with.
All requests in this thread have been dealt with.
Posted:
#
I have a situation within the UK banknote catalogue not of duplicates but of triplicates, no less!
The original page to be kept is https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note204421.html
These two other redundant pages will need the members moving across to the above original and then deleting:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note207566.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note205974.html
Many thanks in advance for your help
The original page to be kept is https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note204421.html
These two other redundant pages will need the members moving across to the above original and then deleting:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note207566.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note205974.html
Many thanks in advance for your help
Just because you can't see it ... doesn't mean it isn't there - Anon.
Former coin and banknote catalogue referee.
Former coin and banknote catalogue referee.
Posted:
#
All done.
Posted:
#
Thanks very much for your help. I have just found another duplicate in the same catalogue section and I could have sworn it was not there before. Sure enough, when I check the history, it appears that the duplicate was created as a *Token* on 26/04 and then was just moved to banknotes in the early hours of this morning.
Original page to be kept: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note201591.html
Duplicate for removal: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note207567.html
Thanks again for all your help
Original page to be kept: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note201591.html
Duplicate for removal: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note207567.html
Thanks again for all your help
Just because you can't see it ... doesn't mean it isn't there - Anon.
Former coin and banknote catalogue referee.
Former coin and banknote catalogue referee.
Posted:
#
Quote: "radrick007"Original page to be kept: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note201591.htmlJust one point to add here, my picture is a P#M22a when on the other page the picture is a P#M22b.
Duplicate for removal: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note207567.html
Thanks again for all your help
Can't we keep the picture in commentary to explain the difference between both before we merge the 2 pages in 1?
Always look on the bright side of life!
Posted:
#
The difference is visible by transparency on P#M22a and a bit on this side of the picture especially on the white frame. If you look at the other image you'll see that this metalic foil isn't visible.
Always look on the bright side of life!
Idolenz
Catalogue referee
Joined: 13 Tem 2013
Posts: 9579
Posts: 9579
Posted: 3 May 2020, 15:06
#
Edited: 3 May 2020, 15:06
Edited: 3 May 2020, 15:06
Posted:
#
Edited:
Edited:
What's up with these strange ©s with two different entries from clearly the same source?
Obverse © KRISHNA KAMESWAR@AMALAPURAM
Reverse © PUTSA@YELESWARAM
Could the member choose one of his, like it seems, many names
Obverse © KRISHNA KAMESWAR@AMALAPURAM
Reverse © PUTSA@YELESWARAM
Could the member choose one of his, like it seems, many names
Posted:
#
Everything until this post it done. Thank you all.
The note from Pakistan was not deleted--the 'duplicate' had the wrong reference number (different coloured note), and the very last set has not been deleted (same link posted twice).
The note from Pakistan was not deleted--the 'duplicate' had the wrong reference number (different coloured note), and the very last set has not been deleted (same link posted twice).
Topic moved to "Numista banknote catalogue"
(Xavier, 6 May 2020, 07:40)
Posted:
#
Hi,
Below a double created by the same user
...
1 and 2
Also please have a look at the french Forum there is some doubles waiting there
Below a double created by the same user
... 1 and 2
Also please have a look at the french Forum there is some doubles waiting there
Always look on the bright side of life!
Posted:
#
Quote: "ngdawa"Both have pictures.Obviously.
But pictures on the page that you suggest to delete seem to be better quality/resolution/details.
Posted:
#
Quote: "smoked_caramel"Ah, ok!Quote: "ngdawa"Both have pictures.Obviously.
Posted:
#
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note213188.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note213187.html
Just curious, why/how would a referee approve these 2 created one after another (judging by the note number)?...
Posted:
#
Everything here is done aside from the notes from Russia and Hong Kong. I will look into those tomorrow--more work is required on those pages before I can move the collections and delete the duplicates.
I do find it easier to deal with individual threads, by the by. That always helps with backlogs like these. Might be better to switch from the sticky-thread to just regular requests (under the ticket 'modification of a banknote page').
I do find it easier to deal with individual threads, by the by. That always helps with backlogs like these. Might be better to switch from the sticky-thread to just regular requests (under the ticket 'modification of a banknote page').
Used time zone is UTC+2:00.
Current time is 08:13.