Catalog numbers and comments. Again... [solved]

3 posts • viewed 56 times
I'd like to clarify what is the recommendation with regards to the main catalog numbers and secondary numbers (letters).

I was under an assumption that in most cases there is only one main catalog number (for a particular catalog, obviously) that is provided/displayed as a "Reference Number" under "Overall Information" section. The secondary number/letter goes into the dateline comment, e.g. "s. Specimen" or "P#123s Specimen".

What about this note though? It lists Pick numbers for all variants under "Reference Numbers". Is this what we want to have?

To me it is just a question of consistency. If that's what we like we should do it for all the notes.
As I was listing my. Notes last night, I submitted edits for this. It should be corrected.
Library Media Specialist, columnist, collector, and gardener...
Quote: "Oklahoman"​As I was listing my. Notes last night, I submitted edits for this. It should be corrected.
Oh, good! It's already approved. 👍 My request for this was rejected, maybe yours got in before mine and made it obsolete. ✌️
Status changed to Solved (smoked_caramel, 15 May 2020, 00:35)

» Forum policy

Used time zone is UTC+2:00.
Current time is 18:33.